<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How Microchipped Dogs Can Still Be Stolen	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.walkervillevet.com.au/blog/dog-theft-in-adelaide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.walkervillevet.com.au/blog/dog-theft-in-adelaide/</link>
	<description>142 North East Road Walkerville Phone (08) 83442000</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 12:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Julie		</title>
		<link>https://www.walkervillevet.com.au/blog/dog-theft-in-adelaide/#comment-150752</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 12:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.walkervillevet.com.au/?p=14354#comment-150752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is my vet thank god thay had the poor little  darling only if fred could  talk !!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my vet thank god thay had the poor little  darling only if fred could  talk !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gillian Shippen		</title>
		<link>https://www.walkervillevet.com.au/blog/dog-theft-in-adelaide/#comment-40629</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gillian Shippen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 06:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.walkervillevet.com.au/?p=14354#comment-40629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Case 1: dog escaped and a dog matching description was found next block away. The &quot;finders&quot; reported to AWL/RSPCA as did the people that lost dog. Matched together, description (even right down to extraordinarily long nails that were under constant maintenance (dog had some problem)  and history fit , location, - everything fit. &quot;Finders&quot; then refused to give the dog up, refusing to believe the &quot;losers&quot;. Dog was excited to see the&quot;losers&quot; but &quot;finders&quot; suggested that was just because the dog was friendly. We were 95% sure the dog was the &quot;losers&quot; dog, however no microchip back then, so no proof. Went to court - the &quot;finders&quot; were awarded custody!

Case two: dog was stolen out of the owners car, with witnesses. Owner did not give up. Saw a local itinerant several days later, walking the dog.  Police were called with the thief denied it was stolen, claiming it as their own.....only thing was in this case the dog&#039;s collar and council registration tag was still on it - case closed!

case three:  cat was brought over from interstate after a family member had found it and tried &quot;absolutely everything&quot; to locate the owner in its home city/state. I asked if they had checked for a microchip  - confused the person that brought it in looked a little frighted (not because they had been caught out , these were very genuine people, believing they were genuinely saving an animal) as they realised that may not have happened and they may have to give up the cat they had all ready fallen head over heals in love with.  I scan, find a microchip, check on the PetAddress, find the data base and owner details..........client burst into tears. &quot;Do we really have to let them know&quot; they ask, hopefully. I point out how much they already feel for the cat and remind them the owner is likely feeling the loss too.......cat is transported back  across state lines to owner]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Case 1: dog escaped and a dog matching description was found next block away. The &#8220;finders&#8221; reported to AWL/RSPCA as did the people that lost dog. Matched together, description (even right down to extraordinarily long nails that were under constant maintenance (dog had some problem)  and history fit , location, &#8211; everything fit. &#8220;Finders&#8221; then refused to give the dog up, refusing to believe the &#8220;losers&#8221;. Dog was excited to see the&#8221;losers&#8221; but &#8220;finders&#8221; suggested that was just because the dog was friendly. We were 95% sure the dog was the &#8220;losers&#8221; dog, however no microchip back then, so no proof. Went to court &#8211; the &#8220;finders&#8221; were awarded custody!</p>
<p>Case two: dog was stolen out of the owners car, with witnesses. Owner did not give up. Saw a local itinerant several days later, walking the dog.  Police were called with the thief denied it was stolen, claiming it as their own&#8230;..only thing was in this case the dog&#8217;s collar and council registration tag was still on it &#8211; case closed!</p>
<p>case three:  cat was brought over from interstate after a family member had found it and tried &#8220;absolutely everything&#8221; to locate the owner in its home city/state. I asked if they had checked for a microchip  &#8211; confused the person that brought it in looked a little frighted (not because they had been caught out , these were very genuine people, believing they were genuinely saving an animal) as they realised that may not have happened and they may have to give up the cat they had all ready fallen head over heals in love with.  I scan, find a microchip, check on the PetAddress, find the data base and owner details&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.client burst into tears. &#8220;Do we really have to let them know&#8221; they ask, hopefully. I point out how much they already feel for the cat and remind them the owner is likely feeling the loss too&#8230;&#8230;.cat is transported back  across state lines to owner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
